Monday, March 23, 2009

The best $20 I ever spent, last week (workflow)



Sometimes a text file on my Mac doesn't cut it. So I went old-school last week and bought a big dry-erase board and started my new method of keeping things organized! 

It's awesome. Things to buy are on the left, things to do in the middle, and Ideas that come to me at completely random times are on the right.

Whenever I need to remind myself what I need to do with photography or just everyday priorities, I don't need to rack my brain or search for it on the Mac; I just look at the big white board! The catch is to *immediately* capture the idea by writing it down; then erasing when I've completed the task or purchased the item. Who knew.

And those double-color eraser-tipped markers are magnetic! I bought it at Target. This is one of two boards that will be on either side of my new desktop (arriving shortly!), and both will do wonders in keeping my photography workflow in ship-shape shape. Thanks, GTD! Details on the other board coming soon...

Saturday, March 14, 2009

World Press Photo meets financial crisis (photos of the year)

My friends, I was "raised" photographically by photo agencies like Magnum Photos and National Geographic. I learned how to shoot photojournalistically before I learned the first thing about weddings. So naturally, I carry some sort of gravitas in some of my images. In any field, though, I think photography does a really good job of portraying the eternal clash between the ying and yang of human nature—namely, fear and desire.

You might also call it love and hate. Or good and evil. Whatever your take is, any image tends to lean towards one or the other. Either a picture of a happy dog jumping up in the air, or a grainy image of a ragged family overlooking a war-torn landscape that has seen better days. However, I guess the most evocative images are those that are the most ambiguous. Like this one::



This won Photo of the Year from World Press Photo.

Taken without context, you might think: war zone. Post-burglary. Somewhere in Russia or something (I just picked a country, no offense to Russians! :).

Taken in context, though, a different story. The caption reads:: "Following eviction, Detective Robert Kole must ensure residents have moved out of their home in Cleveland, Ohio."

Whoa! Now there's a story. But the mystery remains. Why is everything in such disarray? Did looters previously ransack the place? Amazing.

Sometimes I look at these "first place" photographs, and I think, What are they (the judges) thinking. It's grainy, blurry, slightly out-of-focus. It's not technically precise! Then I realize, anything goes in photojournalism. As long as the image's content tells a story, portrays an emotion, emulates either fear or desire (or somehow both!), it works as an image. Its content, the symphony of its elements, will trump technical skill every time. You can have the sharpest, crispest, most vibrant image in the world, and it still can't hold a candle to what another image's content may show you.

This gives me reassurance, because sometimes I don't focus so good! Check out the other World Press Photo contest winners to see what passes for amazing photography these days.